Background: There is a lack of occupation-focused instruments to assess Activities of Daily Living (ADL) that are intended for persons with mental disorders. The ADL Taxonomy is an instrument that is widely-used within clinical practice for persons with physical impairment. The aim of this study was to adapt the ADL Taxonomy for persons with mental disorders and evaluate its validity.
Methods: An expert group of Occupational Therapists (OTs) from psychiatric care adapted the ADL Taxonomy to fit the client group, including creating three new items. OTs in psychiatric care collected client data and evaluated the instrument for usability. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate the contruct validity of 16 activities separately.
Results: The OTs collected 123 assessments from clients with various mental disorders. Ten activities had excellent, and four had acceptable, psychometric properties with regard to item and person fit and unidimensionality. The activity managing the day/time gave complex results and would benefit from further development. The OTs found the test version intelligible, relevant and easy to use.
Conclusions: The ADL Taxonomy for persons with mental disorders has 16 activities with three to six actions each, and is now ready for clinical use. 相似文献
Bronchoscopy is the safest procedure for lung cancer diagnosis when an invasive evaluation is required after imaging procedures. However, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for small and peripheral lesions. We assessed benefits and costs of introducing a bronchial gene-expression classifier (BGC) to improve the performance of bronchoscopy and the overall diagnostic process for early detection of lung cancer. We used discrete-event simulation to compare clinical and economic outcomes of two different strategies with the standard practice in former and current smokers with indeterminate nodules: (i) location-based strategy—integrated the BGC to the bronchoscopy indication; (ii) simplified strategy—extended use of bronchoscopy plus BGC also on small and peripheral lesions. Outcomes modeled were rate of invasive procedures, quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Compared to the standard practice, the location-based strategy (i) reduced absolute rate of invasive procedures by 3.3% without increasing costs at the current BGC market price. It resulted in savings when the BGC price was less than $3,000. The simplified strategy (ii) reduced absolute rate of invasive procedures by 10% and improved quality-adjusted life expectancy, producing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,109 per QALY. In patients with indeterminate nodules, both BGC strategies reduced unnecessary invasive procedures at high risk of adverse events. Moreover, compared to the standard practice, the simplified use of BGC for central and peripheral lesions resulted in larger QALYs gains at acceptable cost. The location-based is cost-saving if the price of classifier declines. 相似文献
It is useful for reviewers of economic evaluations to assess quality in a manner that is consistent and comprehensive. Checklists can allow this, but there are concerns about their reliability and how they are used in practice. We aimed to describe how checklists have been used in systematic reviews of health economic evaluations.
Methods
Meta-review with snowball sampling. We compiled a list of checklists for health economic evaluations and searched for the checklists’ use in systematic reviews from January 2010 to February 2018. We extracted data regarding checklists used, stated checklist function, subject area, number of reviewers, and issues expressed about checklists.
Results
We found 346 systematic reviews since 2010 that used checklists to assess economic evaluations. The most common checklist in use was developed in 1996 by Drummond and Jefferson, and the most common stated use of a checklist was quality assessment. Checklists and their use varied within subject areas; 223 reviews had more than one reviewer who used the checklist.
Conclusions
Use of checklists is inconsistent. Eighteen individual checklists have been used since 2010, many of which have been used in ways different from those originally intended, often without justification. Different systematic reviews in the same subject areas would benefit from using one checklist exclusively, using checklists as intended, and having 2 reviewers complete the checklist. This would increase the likelihood that results are transparent and comparable over time. 相似文献
PurposeThis study develops a checklist with guidelines for the methods and important factors to consider in research using structural equation modeling (SEM).MethodThe paper discusses the factors to consider in the process across the three stages of 1) model setting, 2) model evaluation and modification, and 3) interpretation and reporting of SEM-based studies.ResultsThe authors present a checklist for researchers during the stages of model setting, model evaluation and modification, result analysis, and reporting, along with examples of figures and tables with explanations.ConclusionA checklist will help to improve the reporting quality of SEM-based studies. 相似文献
BackgroundThe purpose of forefoot off-loader shoes (FOS) is to unload the operated region of the foot in order to allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. However, little is known about the actual biomechanical effects of different designs of FOS on gait, pelvis and spine.Research questionAim of this study was to analyse and compare the effects of two different designs of forefoot unloader shoes.MethodsOrtho-Wedge (FOS A) and Relief-Dual® (FOS B) were evaluated in this study during standing and while walking. Changes of the pelvic position and spinal posture were measured with a surface topography system and an instrumented treadmill. Gait phases were detected automatically by a built-in pressure plate.ResultsBoth FOS resulted in a significant increase of pelvic obliquity, pelvic torsion, lateral deviation and surface rotation (p < 0.001) while standing. Between both shoe models, pelvic obliquity and lateral deviation (p < 0.05) were significantly different. During walking, both FOS had a significant effect on spine and pelvis (p < 0.05), however only minor differences were found between the designs. All gait parameters were affected more, wearing FOS A than B. Step length were significantly longer by wearing FOS (p < 0.005). However stance phase raised and swing phase is reduced on the leg wearing FOS A (p < 0.001).SignificanceThe study showed that FOS lead to significant changes in pelvic position and spinal posture during standing and while walking. A compensating shoe on the contralateral side is therefore recommend. Gait parameters however were affected more by the traditional FOS A half-shoe. The sole- design and shape of FOS B leads to a more physiological roll-over of the foot. 相似文献